Historica Olomucensia 1 (2023), 51-71 | DOI: 10.5507/ho.2023.006

The Moravian Pact of 1905: A Model Solution to Ethnic Conflict, or a Way to Deepen Ethnic Conflict in Multi-Ethnic Towns? A Case Study of Olomouc

Andrea Pokludová
Department of History, University of Ostrava

The study deals with the issue of the Moravian Pact (1905) with the example of the city of Olomouc. In the collective memory, Olomouc ranks among Moravian cities with a conflicting coexistence of Czech and German populations at the turn of the twentieth century. The aim of the study was to answer the question of whether the conclusion of the Moravian Pact (1905), which was con­sidered to be a political reconciliation between the Moravian Germans and the Czechs, also led to the overcoming of animosity between the Czech and German population of the city in Olomouc. The choice of Olomouc was not accidental, as: 1. it was an alternative political centre to Brno - the provincial capital, 2. it was a city with a traditionally bilingual population and 3. the city became a centre of Czech and German activists concentrated in organisations such as National Union for East Moravia and Germans in Northern Moravia. In the introductory part of the study, the conflict zones of Czech-German coexistence are presented in detail, i.e. education, local economic life, municipal politics and elections to the Land Diet. Then, on a micro historical level, topics related to the political convention of Moravian Germans and Czechs from 1905, i.e. the Moravian Pact, are elaborated. Specific areas on which the Moravian Pact no longer had such an impact are listed, such as the fight for a child, as the intense activity of Czech activists partially resolved it before the lex Perek came into force. The impact of land elections and the national composition of city officials and civic service are described. There are two basic spheres in which animosity continued to deepen even after the Moravian Pact, namely municipal politics and the local economy. Life in Olomouc on the eve of the Great War did not take place under the sign of the national status quo, but in an atmosphere of persistent friction between Czech and German activists, which was transferred to the everyday life of the city's population. In the end, the consequences led to the fact that the inhabitants were not nationally indifferent, but divided on the national principle into Czechs and Germans. Bilingualism persisted, however, in the communication practice of the population.

Keywords: Moravian Pact 1905; Olomouc; Nationalism; Everyday life

Accepted: April 18, 2023; Published: July 1, 2023  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Pokludová, A. (2023). The Moravian Pact of 1905: A Model Solution to Ethnic Conflict, or a Way to Deepen Ethnic Conflict in Multi-Ethnic Towns? A Case Study of Olomouc. Historica Olomucensia64(1), 51-71. doi: 10.5507/ho.2023.006
Download citation

References

  1. FASORA, Lukáš ̶ HANUŠ, Jiří ̶ MALÍŘ, Jiří: Moravské vyrovnání z roku 1905 - možnosti a limity národnostního smíru ve střední Evropě: sborník příspěvků ze stejnojmenné mezinárodní konference konané ve dnech 10.-11. listopadu 2005 v Brně. Brno 2006.
  2. FISCHEL, Alfred: Die mährischen Ausgleichsgesetze. Brünn 1910.
  3. FISCHER, Richard. Cesta mého života. Volume 4, Pokroková Morava 1893-1918. Olomouc 1937.
  4. FISCHER, Richard: Cesta mého života. Volume 3: Olomouc od r. 1896-1918. Part 2, Olomouc 1937.
  5. FISCHER, Richard: České školství a Matice školská v Olomouci od r. 1872-1918, Volume 1-2, Olomouc 1937, p. 100.
  6. KING, Geremy. Who Is Who? Group Rights in Liberal Austria and the Dilemma of Classificatory Procedure, https://is.muni.cz/el/1421/jaro2009/HIB0387/KingWhoisWho.pdf.
  7. KLADIWA, Pavel ̶ POKLUDOVÁ, Andrea ̶ KAFKOVÁ, Renata: Lesk a bída obecních samospráv Moravy a Slezska 1850-1914. II. díl, 1. svazek, Muži z radnice. Ostrava 2008.
  8. KLADIWA, Pavel ̶ POKLUDOVÁ, Andrea ̶ POPELKA, Petr ̶ CIBULKA, Pavel ̶ ŘEPA, M. Čas změny: Moravský a slezský venkov od zrušení poddanství po Velkou válku. Praha 2021.
  9. KLADIWA, Pavel ̶ POKLUDOVÁ, Andrea ̶ POPELKA, Petr ̶ KADLEC, Petr ̶ GAWRECKI, Dan: Národnostní statistika v českých zemích 1880-1930: mechanismy, problémy a důsledky národnostní klasifikace. I and II Volume. Ostrava 2016.
  10. KLADIWA, Pavel: Revize tzv. Marchetova prováděcího nařízení. Časopis Matice moravské. 2021, 140, issue no. 2, pp. 263-281.
  11. MALÍŘ, Jiří. Der Mährische Ausgleich - ein Vorbild für die Lösung der Nationalitätenfragen? In: WINKELBAUER, Thomas (ed.): Kontakte und Konflikte. Böhmen, Mähren und Österreich. Aspekte eines Jahrtausends gemeinsamer Geschichts. Waidhofen an der Thaya 1993, pp. 337-345.
  12. MALÍŘ, Jiří: Nacionalizace obecní samosprávy a limity demokratizace komunální politiky před rokem 1914 na příkladu Moravy. In: MALÍŘ Jiří. Mezi liberalismem a totalitou: komunální politika ve středoevropských zemích 1848-1918. Sborník příspěvků z konference Archivu hlavního města Prahy 1994. Praha 1997, pp. 73-93.
  13. MAREK, Pavel. K moravským smiřovačkám z let 1898-1905. In: Časopis Matice moravské 111 (1992), no. 1, pp. 75-92.
  14. NĚMEC, Jiří: Der Mährische Ausgleich von 1905. Ein Muster zur Lösung der multiethnischen Ordnung der Gesellschaft? In: BENDEL, Rainer, (ed.) "Ausgleich" als Basis für Verständigung und Versöhnung: zum Beitrag der Historiker für eine integrative Erinnerungskultur. Berlin 2020. pp. 19-32.
  15. POKLUDOVÁ, Andrea: Änderung in der Stadtverwaltung nach dem Ersten Weltkrieg in Troppau und Olmütz. In: CORNELISSE, Christoph ̶ PETRBOK, Václav ̶ PEKÁR, Martin: Stadt und Krieg im 20. Jahrhundert: neue Perspektiven auf Deutschland und Ostmitteleuropa. Essen 2019, pp. 87-112.
  16. POKLUDOVÁ, Andrea: Formování inteligence na Moravě a ve Slezsku 1857-1910. Opava 2008.
  17. POKLUDOVÁ, Andrea: The Stances of JUDr. Richard Fischer on the Moravian Pact: The Limits of Civil Rights and Liberties in Dealing with the National Issues in Moravia on the Eve of the Great War. In: VLČEK, Radovan. Ne-svoboda, despocie a totalitarismus v kultuře a kulturních dějinách. Praha 2021. pp. 95-111.
  18. PUŠ Ivan: Lex Perek a Marchetova prováděcí nařízení: jejich vznik, aplikace a dobová recepce. In: Časopis Matice moravské, 2017, 136, issue no. 1, pp. 81-97. Go to original source...
  19. PUŠ Ivan: Vybrané aktivity olomouckého zastupitele a poslance Rudolfa Sommera. In: Vlastivědný věstník moravský. 2018, 70, issue no. 3, pp. 244-252.
  20. SKENE, Alfred: Der nationale Ausgleich in Mähren 1905. Wien 1910.
  21. VOLNÝ, Řehoř Tomáš ̶ HEINRICH, Albin: Die Markgrafschaft Mähren, topographisch, statistisch und historisch geschildert. V. Band, Olmützer Kreis. Brünn 1839.
  22. ZAHRA, Tara: Kidnapped souls. National Indifference and the Battle for Children in the Bohemian Lands, 1900-1948. Ithaca - London, 2008.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.