Historica Olomucensia vol. S1 (2014), 203-219
Štúdia je zameraná na komparáciu antickej rímskej komédie palliaty a renesančnej commedie erudity. Po vymedzení charakteristík, autorov a umeleckých i mimoumeleckých noriem sa tieto závery aplikujú na jeden príklad z oboch typov komédií. V prípade palliaty pôjde o Aululariu od Plauta, kým eruditu bude reprezentovať Ariostova La Cassaria. Na základe uvedených príkladov sa bude dokazovať, že napriek rozdielom v otázke postavenia autora, cieľového diváka či divadelného prostredia, oba typy komédie potvrdzujú dobovú sociálnu štruktúru spoločnosti. Za pomoci toho, ako opísal fungovanie a sociálnu rolu pána, otroka a ženy Aristoteles v Etike Nikomachovej, sa bude skúmať, či aj autori spomínaných typov komédií potvrdzujú alebo vyvracajú Aristotelove názory.
A study deals with a comparison of Ancient Roman comedy palliata and Renaissance commedia erudita. After stating terms, authors and artistic or non-artistic rules, these conclusions are applied to one example of both types of comedies. In the case of palliata, Aulularia by Plautus will be discussed and erudita will be represented by La Cassaria by Ariosto. On the basis of given examples, it will be demonstrated that in spite of differences in author's status, target theatre audience or theatre surroundings, both types of comedies confirm period social structure in society. According to Aristotle's description of a social role of a master, a slave and a woman in his Nicomachean Ethics, it will be examined whether writers of both discussed types of comedies accept or disprove Aristotle's opinions.
Published: March 11, 2014 Show citation
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
